Wall Street RegretsThe regret calculator.

What if you'd held IWL?

A $1,000 investment in iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) at the month-end close of 2009-09 would be worth $10,349 at the close of 2026-09 — +934.9% total return, dividends reinvested. The same $1,000 in the S&P 500, dividends reinvested, would be worth $9,983.

$1,000 since 2009$10,349Total return+934.9%Multiple10.3×CAGR+14.7%

Your scenario

Dates resolve to the nearest month-end close.
Leave empty for "held until today".
Invested at each month-end. Starts on the buy date.

Result

Worth$10,349Gain+$9,349 (+934.9%)Multiple10.3×CAGR+14.7%

    If you'd bought $1,000 at the start of each year

    Value of $1,000 invested on January 1 of each year, held to 2026-09, dividends included.

    2009$10,3492010$9,6542011$8,6732012$8,4172013$7,2872014$5,5262015$4,8322016$4,7492017$4,3152018$3,5112019$3,6312020$2,7632021$2,2632022$1,7712023$2,2102024$1,7032025$1,3402026$1,125

    Every year, $1,000 from 2009

    YearValue of $1,000Year return
    2009$1,000
    2010$1,113+11.3%
    2011$1,147+3.0%
    2012$1,325+15.5%
    2013$1,747+31.9%
    2014$1,998+14.4%
    2015$2,033+1.7%
    2016$2,237+10.1%
    2017$2,750+22.9%
    2018$2,659-3.3%
    2019$3,494+31.4%
    2020$4,267+22.1%
    2021$5,453+27.8%
    2022$4,368-19.9%
    2023$5,668+29.8%
    2024$7,206+27.1%
    2025$8,581+19.1%
    2026$9,654+12.5%

    Best and worst month-end to buy

    The best single month-end close to have bought IWL was 2010-06 ($18.33): $1,000 then is $10,428 today. The worst was 2026-09 ($191): $1,000 then is $1,000.

    FAQ

    What would $1,000 in IWL be worth today?

    A $1,000 investment in iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) at the start of 2009 would be worth about $10,349 today, a total return of +934.9%. Dividends are reinvested in these figures.

    What were the best and worst years for IWL?

    iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL)'s strongest calendar year since 2009 was 2013, a +31.9% return — $1,000 held through that year became about $1,319 by year-end. Its weakest year was 2022, at -19.9%.

    Does the calculator include dividends and splits?

    Yes where available. Prices are adjusted for both stock splits and reinvested dividends (total return), the same measure brokerages use.

    How much would $100 per month in IWL have grown?

    Investing $100 at the end of every month since 2009-09 would have grown to about $86,990 on $20,500 invested.

    Did IWL beat the S&P 500?

    Over the same period, $1,000 in the S&P 500 with dividends reinvested (the S&P 500 Total Return index) would be worth $9,983. IWL beat the S&P 500 by +3.7% in total return.

    Is this investment advice?

    No. Wall Street Regrets is an entertainment and education tool. Every number is a historical calculation, not a prediction, and past performance never guarantees future results.

    Methodology

    iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) historical total-return data from 2009-09 to 2026-09, reduced to month-end closes for the tables above.

    Returns use adjusted close prices — adjusted for stock splits and reinvested dividends, the same convention used by major brokerages. End-of-day and live prices come from EODHD; parts of the deep historical series are carried over from Yahoo Finance data. A "year" scenario invests $1,000 at the prior December's month-end close and values it at the latest available month-end close. Non-USD amounts are converted at historical month-end exchange rates (EODHD): to USD on the buy date and back to your currency at the latest rate, so the return reflects the currency move as well as the asset.

    Month-end resolution means intra-month extremes are not captured in tables; the calculator uses exact trading-day closes where daily data is available. Figures ignore taxes, fees, and the currency effects of non-USD listings. History is not a forecast. Wall Street Regrets is entertainment, not investment advice.

    Full methodology →

    What if you'd held…

    Data: adjusted close prices via EODHD and Yahoo Finance. As of 2026-09-04. Not financial advice.